(None-Data) - Guaranteed Secure Internet (ITS)

Description

This solution is used within Australia, the E.U. and the U.S.. It combines standards associated with (None–Data) with those for I–I: Guaranteed Secure Internet (ITS). The (None–Data) standards include an unspecified set of standards at the upper layers. The I–I: Guaranteed Secure Internet (ITS) standards include lower–layer standards that support secure communications with guaranteed delivery between ITS equipment using X.509 or IEEE 1609.2 security certificates.

Includes Standards

LevelDocNumFullNameDescription
MgmtIETF RFC 3411An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management FrameworksThis standard (RFC) defines the basic architecture for SNMPv3 and includes the definition of information objects for managing the SNMP entity's architecture.
MgmtIETF RFC 3412Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)This standard (RFC) contains a MIB that assists in managing the message processing and dispatching subsystem of an SNMP entity.
MgmtIETF RFC 3413Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) ApplicationsThis standard (RFC) includes MIBs that allow for the configuration and management of remote Targets, Notifications, and Proxys.
MgmtIETF RFC 3414User–based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)This standard (RFC) contains a MIB that assists in configuring and managing the user–based security model.
MgmtIETF RFC 3415View–based Access Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)This standard (RFC) contains a MIB that supports the configuration and management of the View–based access control model of SNMP.
MgmtIETF RFC 3416Version 2 of the Protocol Operations for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)This standard (RFC) defines the message structure and protocol operations used by SNMPv3.
MgmtIETF RFC 3418Management Information Base (MIB) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)This standard (RFC) defines the MIB to configure and manage an SNMP entity.
MgmtIETF RFC 4293Management Information Base for the Internet Protocol (IP)This standard (RFC) defines the MIB that manages an IP entity.
SecurityIETF RFC 5280Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) ProfileThis standard (RFC) defines how to use X.509 certificates for secure communications over the Internet.
SecurityIETF RFC 8446The Transport Layer Security (TLS) ProtocolThis standard (RFC) specifies Version 1.3 of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol. The TLS protocol provides communications security over the Internet. The protocol allows client/server applications to communicate in a way that is designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, or message forgery.
ITS Application Entity Standard(s) need to be developedOne or more standards need to be developed for this subject matter before this is considered a complete solution.
Facilities Standard(s) need to be developedOne or more standards need to be developed for this subject matter before this is considered a complete solution.
TransNetIETF RFC 4291IP Version 6 Addressing ArchitectureThis standard (RFC) defines the addressing architecture of the IP Version 6 (IPv6) protocol. It includes the IPv6 addressing model, text representations of IPv6 addresses, definition of IPv6 unicast addresses, anycast addresses, and multicast addresses, and an IPv6 node's required addresses.
TransNetIETF RFC 4443Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) SpecificationThis standard (RFC) defines the control messages to manage IPv6.
TransNetIETF RFC 8200Internet Protocol, Version 6This document specifies version 6 of the Internet Protocol (IPv6).
TransNetIETF RFC 9293Transmission Control ProtocolThis document specifies the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). TCP is an important transport–layer protocol in the Internet protocol stack, and it has continuously evolved over decades of use and growth of the Internet. Over this time, a number of changes have been made to TCP as it was specified in RFC 793, though these have only been documented in a piecemeal fashion. This document collects and brings those changes together with the protocol specification from RFC 793. This document obsoletes RFC 793, as well as RFCs 879, 2873, 6093, 6429, 6528, and 6691 that updated parts of RFC 793. It updates RFCs 1011 and 1122, and it should be considered as a replacement for the portions of those documents dealing with TCP requirements. It also updates RFC 5961 by adding a small clarification in reset handling while in the SYN–RECEIVED state. The TCP header control bits from RFC 793 have also been updated based on RFC 3168.
Access Internet Subnet AlternativesA set of alternative standards that includes any Subnet Layer method of connecting to the Internet.

Readiness: Lowest

Readiness Description

Many serious issues. This category includes solutions that have not been standardized, or do not have a basic level of interoperability or security. Consider selecting a different communications solution or if this is not possible (eg. a pilot of a new application that has not been standardized), take additional measures to provide an acceptable level of security or interoperability.

Supports Interfaces

SourceDestinationFlow
CAT Operations CenterEGF Dispatchtransit emergency data
CAT Operations CenterGF PSAPalert status
CAT Operations CenterGF PSAPtransit emergency data
CAT Operations CenterGF–EGF Emergency Managementemergency plan coordination
EGF DispatchGF PICalert notification
EGF DispatchGF TOCemergency route request
EGF DispatchMnDOT D2 Officealert notification
GF PICEGF Dispatchalert status
GF PICGF PSAPalert status
GF PSAPCAT Operations Centeralert notification
GF PSAPCAT Operations Centerthreat information
GF PSAPGF PICalert notification
GF PSAPGF TOCalert notification
GF PSAPGF TOCemergency route request
GF PSAPNDDOT GF District Officealert notification
GF PW Operations CenterGF PSAPalert status
GF TOCEGF Dispatchalert status
GF TOCEGF Dispatchemergency routes
GF TOCGF PSAPalert status
GF TOCGF PSAPemergency routes
GF TOCGF–EGF Emergency Managementemergency plan coordination
GF TOCGF–EGF Emergency Managementroad network status assessment
GF TOCGF–EGF Maintenanceroad network status assessment
GF TOC Field DevicesGF TOCrail crossing blockage notification
GF–EGF Emergency ManagementCAT Operations Centeremergency plan coordination
GF–EGF Emergency ManagementGF TOCemergency plan coordination
GF–EGF Emergency ManagementGF–EGF Maintenanceemergency plan coordination
GF–EGF MaintenanceGF TOCroad network status assessment
GF–EGF MaintenanceGF–EGF Emergency Managementemergency plan coordination
GF–EGF MaintenanceGF–EGF Emergency Managementroad network status assessment
MnDOT D2 Field DevicesMnDOT D2 Officerail crossing blockage notification
MnDOT D2 OfficeEGF Dispatchalert status
NDDOT GF District OfficeEGF Dispatchalert status
NDDOT GF District OfficeGF PSAPalert status
State RadioGF PICalert notification